After reading Thomas Schatz’s,
“Film Genre and the Genre of Film,” my knowledge of both these broad concept greatly
increased. Genre has always been an
aspect of film that has perplexed me.
Going back to debates such as, “is film noir a genre,” genre has always
been a cinematic element that I have had trouble defining. I enjoyed Schatz’s statement that “changes in cultural attitudes, new
influential genre films, the economics of the industry, and so forth,
continually refine and film genre.” This
quote shows that film genre is the broader subject and that genre films can be
grouped within the confines of film genre.
He suggests that the English language allows people to communicate
with one another and that we share values and ideas of the language that shapes our
perception and habits. Just like
language, film genre allows viewers to share basic interpretations of any genre
film. Schatz stresses cultural context throughout. He describes genre as a range of expression
for filmmakers and a range of experience for the viewers. He sees characters as the physical embodiment
of an attitude or a style. Characters such as cops and robbers represent basic
cultural values. While I found his
entire article to be very interesting, is this argument that I found to be the
most compelling. I believe a great way
to analyze genre is to dissect the characters of the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.